
“We continue to see instances of possible flying and printing in several markets, including fixed income, commodities, and currencies in instruments such as bonds, swaps and options.”
The FCA’s latest Market Watch (76) re-emphasises the regulator's ongoing concerns about firms publishing incorrect volume data and the possible market abuse risks that ensue. “Flying” and “Printing” were first brought to light as a concern in November 2018, in the FCA’s 57th edition of the Market Watch series.
Both flying and printing intend to distort the true supply and demand dynamics in both quoted and OTC markets, influencing the perceived value of, or demand for, assets, prompting other market participants to trade based on false and/or misleading information. Despite highlighting these market abuse typologies in Market Watch 57, the FCA continues to see instances surfacing in a range of markets. Additionally, the regulator has ongoing concerns related to organisations’ management failing to deal with these behaviours in a robust and timely manner, including:
In November 2020, the FCA imposed a fine of £3.44m against TFS-ICAP Ltd, an FX options broker, for ‘printing trades’ between 2008 and 2015. This involved brokers communicating to their clients that a trade had occurred at a particular price and/or quantity when no such trade had actually taken place. TFS-ICAP brokers, across multiple broking desks, did this openly and over a prolonged period.
The firm's failure to detect or prevent these actions, a lack of record-keeping, and inadequate oversight highlighted significant compliance deficiencies
The FCA's regulations of market conduct apply to a wide array of financial firms, including investment banks, brokerage firms, asset managers, and entities involved in trading derivatives, commodities, and currencies. However, certain firms are at higher risk of dealing with practices such as flying and printing than others.
Price Printing and Flying are more at risk of occurring in firms that have clients, such as brokerage firms and sell side firms, and are trying to generate interest to trade or execute. While buy-side firms are less likely to be at risk, precautionary measures still need to be considered.
Hedge funds, for example, with their substantial capital, are capable of significantly influencing market prices and liquidity. Their use of complex strategies, alongside high-frequency and algorithmic trading, increases the potential for inadvertently engaging in activities that could be perceived as market manipulation. This heightened risk profile necessitates stringent compliance and surveillance measures to ensure these firms adhere to market integrity standards.
In addressing the risks of market manipulation through flying and printing, the FCA advises firms to adopt stringent measures to preserve market integrity:
Effective surveillance hinges on sophisticated algorithms capable of detecting irregularities indicative of market manipulation:
eflow's TZTS solution exemplifies how technology can be leveraged to monitor for and analyse suspected instances of market manipulation effectively. This comprehensive trade surveillance platform utilises a mix of data enrichment, automated monitoring and real-time insights to identify manipulative patterns, including insider trading and market abuse. Its ability to analyse both real-time and historical data ensures a thorough scrutiny of trading activities.
TZTS can be configured to meet specific regulatory demands and uses sophisticated algorithms to automatically monitor your trades for more than 40 types of market abuse, facilitating the prompt identification of suspicious activities. The integrated workflow management system aids in the swift investigation and documentation of these alerts, ensuring regulatory compliance and facilitating detailed reporting on detected market abuse incidents.
For more information on TZTS, click here or get in touch to arrange a consultation.