- Generic alert parameters create false positives.
- eflow calibrates trade surveillance to your firm's trading activity and risk profile, so your team spends its time on genuine risk.
- Our clients have cut false positives by up to 70%.
See eflow in action, in your own time
No sales call needed. Click through four short interactive chapters and see how compliance teams use eflow day to day.
Most of the noise your analysts clear each week comes from generic alert parameters that were never calibrated to how your firm trades.
Challenge: Hundreds of alerts a week, and almost none of them matter. The one that does is buried in the pile.
How eflow helps: Alert parameters calibrated to how your firm trades. Rules-based and risk-based models surface genuine threats and suppress low-quality alerts.
Outcome: Up to 70% fewer false positives for eflow clients.
Challenge: Trades in one tool, communications in another and escalation notes somewhere else.
How eflow helps: Review, manage and escalate alerts in one system. Trade and communications surveillance sit side by side, and audit-ready reports take seconds.
Outcome: One system, from alert to escalation.
Challenge: Every alert means pulling trade history, past alerts and communications together, then proving how you reached your decision.
How eflow helps: Ask PATH AI Analyst questions in plain language. Every insight traces back to source data, with a full audit trail.
Outcome: No black box. Your team stays in control.
Challenge: The desk changes strategy. Tuning a live system blind risks more noise, or worse, missed risk.
How eflow helps: Test parameter changes against your own historical data in the Sandbox, and see the impact on alert quality before anything goes live.
Outcome: Validate first, then go live.
No. PATH AI Analyst traces every insight back to its source data and keeps a full audit trail, so you can show regulators and senior management how each conclusion was reached. It's an opt-in feature, and your analysts stay accountable for every decision.
Yes. eflow supports firms across the UK, Europe, the U.S. and Asia-Pacific, under regimes including those of the FCA, FINRA, SEC and CFTC.
It doesn't have to be. Timelines depend on your scope and integrations, and we'll map out a realistic plan for your firm in your demo. You'll have a dedicated onboarding specialist, and historical data can be loaded into the Sandbox to validate your set-up before go-live.
Pricing depends on your products, volumes and integrations. We'll cover it in your demo, so you get a realistic figure for your firm.
"We have been consistently impressed with eflow’s constant dedication to ensuring that our compliance needs are met. We would recommend them to any firm looking for a market abuse or best execution solution."
Regulators have issued $6.6bn in market abuse-related fines since 2019, mostly for trade surveillance, controls and supervisory failures. The report tracks enforcement across 11 regulators, including the FCA, SEC, CFTC and FINRA, and surveys 300 compliance leaders on AI, alert calibration and integrating trade and eComms surveillance.
